Congress can’t have it both ways on taxpayer-funded sanctions and rewards. If gasoline imports indirectly support Iran’s nuclear ambitions, then $2.775 billion in cash for conventional U.S. weapons and military technology clearly allows Israel to focus on development and deployment of its illicit nuclear arsenal. Recently released CIA files long ago forecast that such an arsenal would not only make Israel more “assertive” but also more reluctant to engage in bona fide peace initiatives. Cutting the massive indirect U.S. subsidization of Israel’s nukes and insisting that Israel sign the NPT would go further in averting a nuclear arms race and conflicts in the region than targeting hapless Iranians at the gas pump. It would also demonstrate to the American public that the president and Congress, even under the pressure of AIPAC, won’t blatantly violate U.S. foreign aid laws by publicly pretending Iran – rather than Israel – is the region’s nuclear hegemon.  More

"AIPAC legislated restrictions on US businesses and workers already cost 100,000 American jobs per year. New AIPAC legislation targeting Iran could lead to further jobs loss."

An AIPAC effort in Congress seeks to cut off U.S. loans to some American companies doing business with India and Iran. US exports to Iran have boomed from $85 million in 2004 to $683 million last year as US grain and other foodstuffs find eager Persian buyers.  AIPAC sponsored amendments to the draft fiscal 2010 State and foreign operations appropriations bill will give members their first chance to vote on Iran sanctions since that country’s presidential election on June 12.

 Rep. Mark Steven Kirk , R-Ill. said the AIPAC legislation targeted Reliance Industries, a large energy company based in India that reportedly has provided Iran with as much as a third of its refined petroleum. Kirk will offer the measure when the House Appropriations Committee takes up the draft bill.  Kirk is the top 2008 recipient of Israel stealth political action committee (PAC) contributions according to the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs.  He received $91,200 during the 2008 election cycle and more than $221,000 over his career.  The Superior Court of the District of Columbia is still debating whether to regulate AIPAC as a political action committee after it was shown secretly directing such funding in violation of US campaign finance laws in the 1980s and 1990s.

Grant Smith, the director of the Institute for Research: Middle Eastern Policy (IRmep) was critical of Kirk's move and the legislation's sponsor.  "AIPAC has a history of pushing policies that ultimately harm US workers and the American economy.  The flawed US-Israel bilateral trade agreement has cost the US 100,000 jobs per year over the last decade.  Other legislative initiatives pushed by the Israel lobby have negatively impacted the US share in the Arab market, which dropped from 12.77% in 1997 to 8.55% in 2008.  American workers don't want to become innocent victims of AIPAC's trade and foreign policy adventures."  More

A newly declassified 1960 report on Israel’s nukes underscores role in foreign policy "assertiveness."

"Possession of a nuclear weapon capability, or even the prospect of achieving it, would clearly give Israel a greater sense of security, self-confidence, and assertiveness...Israel would be less inclined than ever to make concessions..." are conclusions of a CIA Special National Intelligence Estimate released on June 5, 2009.

The December 1960 intelligence analysis, parts which are still classified, offers timely context as the Obama administration struggles to slow booming settlement activities in lands Israel captured during preemptive attacks in 1967. More

On May 14, US attorneys quietly filed a sealed motion (PDF) "as to Lawrence Anthony Franklin" in the Eastern District of Virginia. Judge Ellis then granted a hearing for June 12 at 9AM. On June 2, they filed a sealed memorandum about Franklin. Though sealed motions are of course secret, it is likely that under the watchful eye of Eric Holder the DOJ's political appointees are arranging yet another special favor for the Israel lobby in order to steer around the Obama pardon dilemma.

As is now customary, any potential future downsides and details of such a sealed deal are not allowed to be publicly debated. Just as quiet clemency for Schwimmer and Greenspun paved the way for weapons smuggling to Iran, this quiet effort will undoubtedly yield some future crisis... More

Observers of this vestigial legacy of the AIPAC criminal trial may hope that Rosen's attempts at securing "major discovery" will shed additional light on AIPAC's activities.  Whether or not Rosen's filing is several years too late, growing public awareness of the costs of AIPAC's many stealth activities are already a highly positive outcome of his lawsuit. More

The US-Israel Free Trade Area (UIFTA) became law in 1985, but ongoing violations of American intellectual property rights and trade laws are fueling heavy losses of American jobs. As the US economy declines many are trying to separate myths from facts about America's first bilateral trade agreement:

Myth: The US Israel Free Trade Area (UIFTA) delivers "mutual benefits".

Fact: Since 1985 US trade with Israel shifted from a surplus to a cumulative $71 billion deficit (adjusted for inflation). The $7.8 billion US deficit with Israel in 2008 equals 126,000 US manufacturing related jobs. UIFTA is the only bilateral pact producing multi-billion dollar losses to the US every year over the last decade.

Myth: UIFTA is supported by US industries and associations.

Fact: During 1984 negotiations seventy-six leading American companies such as Monsanto, Dow Chemical, Sunkist, Hunt-Wesson Foods and organizations such as the AFL-CIO, American Farm Bureau and the US Bromine Alliance testified against the UIFTA. Only seventeen organizations -- most with no direct economic stakes -- testified in favor. More recently pharmaceutical, agricultural and other industry associations have continued to lobby against unfair Israeli trade practices...  More Myths vs Facts  Brochure  (PDF) History  Petition to Suspend

...The so-called War on Terror may be extremely profitable for weapons manufacturers, private military corporations, and the venal pro-war pundits they fund, but who else does it benefit?

Big Oil, says the antiwar left. But the “no blood for oil” adherents too may be misinformed, according to one leading analyst of the Iraq war. “Contrary to the view of most American progressives that oil, and specifically the interests of Big Oil, is the primary mover, there is no evidence that the major US oil corporations pressured Congress or promoted the war in Iraq or the current confrontation with Iran,” James Petras argues in The Power of Israel in the United States. “To the contrary: there is plenty of evidence that they are very uneasy about the losses that may result from an Israeli attack on Iran.”

And as for the American people, or at least those lucky enough to hold their jobs in the coming Wall Street-induced depression, they will be paying dearly in greatly increased taxes for their government’s folly for the foreseeable future.

Considering all this, it is difficult not to concur with the conclusion of a policy paper published by the Institute for Research: Middle Eastern Policy (IRmep) that the War on Terror has been “for the most part, extremely damaging to US interests.”   More

As Congress debates foreign aid legislation, it's time to remember nuclear nonproliferation restrictions on US taxpayer funded expenditures.

Former astronaut and Senator John Glenn amended aid legislation in 1977.  Since then, the US may not provide civilian or military aid to any foreign country trafficking nuclear technology outside the international nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty safeguards. Recent confirmations by US officials that Israel is a nuclear weapons state mean that unless President Barak Obama signs a special waiver to the Speaker of the House and Senate Foreign Relations Committee, no US foreign aid may legally be delivered to Israel in 2010. 

See the Israel Lobby Archive 1977 Glenn Amendment
(Source: HeinOnline--91 Stat 620 1977)

See current US foreign aid law, as amended
(Source: Cornell US Legal Code website )

More  See also:  Will Obama Break the Law for Israel's Sake? And the Israel Lobby Archive

Supporters of the Israel lobby have long maintained that the reason it does not have to register as an agent of a foreign government is that its funding and composition are indigenous to the US. Even critics such as Mearsheimer and Walt have declared its operations "as American as apple pie." However, as Smith reveals, the lobby was only able to turn into the powerhouse it is today because of the start-up funding it received from Israel and its ability -- through stonewalling, deception and subversion of the legal process -- to stave off the State Department and the Department of Justice's attempts to have it registered as a foreign agent. In fascinating detail supported by hundreds of declassified documents (reproduced in the Appendix) Smith reveals the various mechanisms it employed to avoid the purview of the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA). The lobby's greatest success -- to propagate the myth that Israel and the US have identical interests and common enemies -- would not have been possible had the Department of Justice succeeded in securing its compliance with FARA. This law requires entities registered under it to mark all their informational material with the disclaimer that their author is the agent of a foreign government. More

A legal filing to the United States Trade Representative (USTR) calls for suspension of the US-Israel Free Trade Area. The Institute for Research: Middle Eastern Policy (IRmep) "Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974" filing includes previously unreleased internal International Trade Commission (ITC) files recently obtained under the Freedom of Information Act and testimony from US counterintelligence agencies and concerned American industries...

The IRmep's legal challenge, representing concerned industries and associations from 37 states committed to stamping out Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) violations quantifies how ongoing trade secrets theft from US military, pharmaceutical, chemical and agricultural industries directly translate into American jobs losses. Input-output table exhibits derived from US Census Bureau data reveal that American jobs losses caused by the trade pact widened from 50,000 in 1999 to 126,000 in 2008. A comparative analysis against more beneficial bilateral trade agreements shows that canceling the US-Israel FTA would produce an immediate net economic benefit to the United States while fortifying rules based global trade and intellectual property rights.  More

When taped a few years ago, our gal was talking to someone at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. AIPAC has long controlled a great many American politicians; its website quotes the New York Times’ assessment of it as "the most important organization affecting America's relationship with Israel." In fact, AIPAC so emphasizes "Israel" at the expense of "American" that the Kennedy Administration, among others, insisted it register as an agent of a foreign government.

Jane’s conversation with this foreign agent concerned two of its officers whom the Feds accuse of espionage. Steven Rosen and Keith Weissman will finally stand trial this June; the FBI alleges that they forwarded classified information from a source at the Pentagon to the Israeli government.  More

Global pharmaceuticals companies, which often argue that Israel should pass stricter legislation to protect intellectual property, have received support from an unexpected corner recently: the Institute for Research: Middle Eastern Policy (IRmep), a U.S.-based Muslim organization, has filed an urgent petition to the United States Trade Representative demanding the immediate suspension of preferential Israeli access to the U.S. market under the Free Trade Area agreement.

In a 92-page legal filing the organization claims that Israel repeatedly violates intellectual property rights in the military and pharmaceutical industries, among other allegations...The petition contains numerous examples of alleged Israeli violations of U.S. intellectual property rights in various areas. These include some overtly political claims, for instance, that illegal settlements are being financed through the export of cut diamonds to the U.S. ...

Israel is taking the petition seriously. The U.S. is already pressing Israel, with the encouragement of pharmaceutical giants, to enact stricter intellectual property protections... 

An official from one of the ministries involved in the issue said that the US Trade Representative is obligated to respond to every petition. He said the institute's petition set a dangerous precedent for transforming Israel's professional dispute with the USTR into a political one.

Under U.S. law, the USTR must make public any investigation against Israel within 45 days. More

RFI: King Abdullah of Jordan met this week in Washington with President Barak Obama.  The monarch was the first Middle East leader invited to visit during the new administration.  The dialogue permitted the US president to expand upon his new policies for the region.  Obama invited the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian Leader Mahmoud Abbas as well as the Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak.  The triple meetings signal Washington's firm course toward the two-state solutions in the Middle East: Israel and Palestine. The analysis of IRmep director Grant Smith:

Grant Smith:  They are firmly backing this desire to put a two state program into place, a Palestinian state alongside Israel, before all else.  They are trying to shore that up by meeting with different sides at the same time in separate meetings. 

Before this announcement there was a push for an exclusive Obama-Netanyahu meeting—Obama rejected that kind of program for a more open dialogue with parties to the conflict in Washington simultaneously.  That's a huge change, and members of the Obama cabinet have clearly stated, "the program is for two states, side by side, that's the track we're pursuing," neither the overt preference, nor siding openly with the Israelis as we saw in the Bush administration.

A 92 page legal filing urges the United States Trade Representative (USTR) to immediately suspend preferential Israeli access to the US market. 

In 1983 the Israeli Prime Minister and American Israel Public Affairs Committee (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) lobbied the Reagan administration for preferential Israeli access to the US market.  In spite of overwhelming opposition from US agricultural, industrial and citizens groups over Israel's weak protection for intellectual property rights, the US-Israel Free Trade Area was signed into law in 1985. 

Intellectual property violations tainted negotiations of the agreement in 1984 when the FBI discovered that AIPAC obtained a copy of the secret report "Probable Economic Effect of Providing Duty Free Treatment for U.S. Imports from Israel, Investigation No. 332-180."  The still classified 300 page report was compiled from business confidential market share, cost, and other closely held information solicited by the International Trade Commission for USTR use in negotiations.

Throughout the 1980s and 1990s US intelligence agencies uncovered Israeli networks illicitly acquiring and transferring intellectual property on US weapons systems.  Purloined intellectual property for missiles, imaging technology and other weapons was subsequently incorporated into Israeli systems.   Some Israeli systems were then exported to rogue regimes and rivals American manufacturers avoided under US arms export prohibitions.

For each of the past three years, the Israeli Ministry of Health and pharmaceutical manufacturers have been placed on USTR watch lists for practices that cost US manufacturers billions of dollars.  But calls for enforcement of trade rules have generated no results.  Worse, proceeds from ballooning Israeli cut diamond exports to the US have been used to finance illegal West Bank settlements in contravention of Obama administration policy.

Leading Iraq specialists from the US and abroad will discuss the foundations of the Iraqi state and society in public memory.  Paper presentations and general discussion from Nadje Al-Ali (University of London), Orit Bashkin (University of Chicago), Magnus Bernhardsson (Williams College), Hamit Bozarslan (Ecole de hautes etudes, Paris) Geraline Sluglett (University of Utah), Reidar Visser (Norwegian Institute of International Affairs).  Workshop information and RSVP here.

04/08/2009 AntiWar

The Samson Gambit

RFI:  On Monday President Obama stopped in Turkey during his European tour.  Turkey is the largest NATO and Muslim ally of the US.  In Ankara President Obama sought to restore relations frayed by Turkey's refusal to serve as a base for the US invasion of Iraq.  In an address before the Turkish Parliament he declared firm US support for Turkey's candidacy in the European Union, a move immediately rejected by France.   For an analysis of the importance of Turkey for Washington and the new administration we present Grant Smith, director of the IRmep:

Grant Smith: Turkey is a focal point revealing redefined US Middle East policy.   In particular [Obama] has dispensed with the slogan "war on terror" and more, in Turkey he clarified that there is no US war against Islam.  We think he is trying to dispose of the entire Bush administration policy framework.   

Simultaneously there is a realignment of regional relations.  For example, the distance between Turkey and Israel has widened after the Israeli rampage in Gaza.  Also the US is restarting direct communications with Iran.  This seems to be a more productive US consideration of Syria, Turkey and Iran oriented toward diplomacy rather raw military calculations.

03/26/2009 FOXBusiness PRNewsWire

Trial for AIPAC Employees Indicted Under Espionage Act

"Quietly folding this prosecution would promote a growing perception across America that some organizations and individuals are free to break the law with impunity, at great cost to law abiding citizens." said IRmep Director Grant F. Smith. "Based upon the alleged activities raised by the indictment our supporters from 37 states urge the Department of Justice to proceed to trial. Doing otherwise could have grave consequences for governance in America."  More

Free trade agreements (FTAs) are supposed to help American businesses improve their profits, create more jobs and build their industries by opening new markets for export of their products with foreign countries under rules based trade. The US has FTAs with 20 foreign nations, including six added in 2006, Bahrain, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Morocco, and Nicaragua. Israel lobbied for a bilateral Free Trade Agreement with the US in 1984 and it was approved in 1985. But since then, according to a study conducted by the Washington DC based Institute for Research: Middle East Policy (IRmep) of documents released only last year, the United States has lost more than $71 billion in the deal and the equivalent of an average of 100,000 jobs in each of the past 10 years alone.

This is a staggering discovery considering that the United States is today in one of the worst economic depressions in its history and that the American unemployment rate continues to rise, now past 8.2 percent nationwide.  More

Chicago radio host Ray Hanania and Grant Smith discuss an upcoming IRmep report about the US-Israel Free Trade Area (FTA):

1. Impact of AIPAC and the Israeli government's acquisition of business confidential information provided by concerned US industries to the US Trade Representative during negotiations;
2. Ongoing commercial espionage in weapons systems design, pharmaceutical clinical dossiers, and other intellectual property;
3. Why the agreement is the only bilateral FTA producing multi-billion dollar yearly deficits now totaling $71 billion and negative jobs impact of 126,000 manufacturing related jobs;
4. Measures the Obama administration should take as it begins reevaluating FTAs against the new trade agenda.

The program is now available for download as an .mp3 audio file.

This week Al Jazeera English is broadcasting a special report about the Obama administration, regional policy and the Israel Lobby.  Al Jazeera has an audience reach of over 120 million households in more than 100 countries. The program is also available on demand via YouTube:

Empire - Part 1 (25 min)
US policy in the Middle East and the "Special Relationship" with Israel. Host Marwan Bishara and  Avi Shlaim, Aaron David Miller, Adam Shatz, Ilan Pappe, MJ Rosenberg, Harry Lonsdale, Earl Hilliard, and Grant F. Smith. 
Empire - Part 2 (22 min)
The forced neoconservative convergence of US-Israel strategy in the Middle East through the post 9/11 "war on terror".  Avi Shlaim, Jim Lobe, Anotoli Levin, Stephen Walt, and Hani Shukrallah. More

02/23/2009 AntiWar

Should AIPAC Decide What's Classified?

The consequences of the alleged AIPAC espionage now on its way to trial could have been far worse. We now know that Israel solicited American approval to attack Iran over its civilian nuclear program and sought both overflight rights and advanced munitions from the United States. Both requests were denied on the basis of U.S. national security interests. If Rosen and Weissman's parallel intelligence-collection project had gone undetected and actually succeeded – the FBI was investigating their movements since at least 1999 – AIPAC might have been able to leverage the NDI through press, pressure, and propaganda into permission for Israeli or even U.S. strikes against Iran. Perhaps with J. William Leonard in tow, AIPAC's abuse of national defense secrets will succeed the next time around. But the fallout from attacking yet another country on false pretexts is unfathomable. This is why Americans observing mainstream pundits and assorted ideologues trumpeting the current course of the long-delayed AIPAC espionage trial as a victory for freedom of the press should ponder this: is it really in our best interests that Israel and its American lobby be empowered to classify or declassify American secrets at their whim?   More

02/23/2009 Wall Street Journal's Marketwatch via PRNewsWire

AIPAC Trade Secrets Leak Led to $71 Billion Export Loss

The ITC compiled "business confidential" information and intellectual property solicited from US corporations and industry associations into a classified report for the negotiations. But on August 3, 1984 the Washington Post broke the news that the FBI was investigating how AIPAC obtained one of the fifteen numbered and tightly controlled copies of the classified report. The ITC later confirmed it was also obtained by the Israeli government.

Since the agreement was signed in 1985, US trade with Israel shifted from surplus to a cumulative $71 billion deficit (adjusted for inflation). The 2008 $7.8 billion deficit with Israel was equivalent to 126,000 US manufacturing related jobs. It is the only bilateral FTA producing multi-billion dollar losses to the US every year for the last decade but total losses are still unknown. According to IRmep director Grant F. Smith the agreement was the beginning of a chain reaction of intellectual property theft documented by industry associations and US counterintelligence agencies: "US corporations were betrayed by the leaks of their intellectual property during treaty negotiations in 1984. US pharmaceutical, defense and other industries continue to lose billions in revenue to Israeli copy-cat merchandise. We are only beginning to fully understand the larger impact of AIPAC and the Israeli government's ongoing acquisition of classified US information."  More

...Fortunately, Americans don't need Barack Obama to "speculate" on what former President Jimmy Carter already confirmed on May 25, 2008: Israel possesses an arsenal of at least 150 nuclear weapons. Why does Obama trot out the discredited policy of "strategic ambiguity" – in which Israeli and U.S. officials officially refuse to confirm or deny the existence Israeli nuclear weapons – at this early moment? For one reason alone: to break the law. The 1976 Symington Amendment prohibits most U.S. foreign aid to any country found trafficking in nuclear enrichment equipment or technology outside international safeguards. Israel has never signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). If U.S. presidents complied with the Symington Amendment, they would not deliver yearly aid packages to Israel totaling billions of dollars. Presidents make-believe that Israeli nuclear weapons don't exist so Congress can legally continue shoveling the lion's share of the U.S. foreign aid budget to Israel. But this thin pretense is now over. Since Carter's revelation, press outlets such as Reuters chat openly about how Israel's nukes mean that it does not qualify for U.S. aid. But like Harry Markopolos incessantly nagging the SEC about Bernie Madoff's Ponzi scheme, fourth-estate and nuclear-activist calls for compliance continue to be rebuffed by government agencies. Denying Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests about Israeli nukes has always been an integral tactic in preserving this hoary old ruse.   More  Spanish/Espanol

...It was the best con game in town: get paid well for selling vast amounts of risk, fail, and then have governments fix the problem at the expense of the taxpayers who never saw a penny of shared wealth to begin with.  There is no easy solution to this crisis, its effects multiplying like an infectious disease.  Ironically, least affected by the crisis are Islamic banks.

They have largely been immune to the collapse because Islamic banking prohibits the acquisition of wealth via gambling (or alcohol, tobacco, pornography, or stocks in armaments companies), and forbids the buying and selling of a debt as well as usury. Additionally, Shari'ah banking laws forbid investing in any company with debts that exceed thirty percent.

"Islamic banking institutions have not failed per se as they deal in tangible assets and assume the risk" said Dr. Mohammed Ramady, Professor of Economics at King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals. "Although the Islamic banking sector is also part of the global economy, the impact of direct exposure to sub-prime asset investments has been low" he continued. "The liquidity slowdown has especially affected Dubai, with its heavy international borrowing. The most negative effect has been a loss of confidence in the regional stock markets." Instead, said Dr. Ramady, oil surplus Arab nations are "reconsidering overseas investments in financial assets" and speeding up their own domestic projects.  More

Former Clinton Administration Middle East diplomat Dennis Ross is under consideration as US State Department envoy to Iran. Ross is currently the chairman of the Jewish People Policy Planning Institute (JPPPI) in Jerusalem, established by the Jewish Agency in 2002. Ross could face legal challenges under the 1938 Foreign Agents Registration Act, or FARA, if he enters US government service.

FARA protects the American people and Congress from stealth propaganda and foreign lobbying through strict public disclosure filings. The Jewish Agency has repeatedly surfaced during investigations in the US. In the 1960s the Senate Foreign Relations Committee uncovered a network of stealth Jewish Agency "conduits" financing grassroots Israel lobby startup groups through the American Zionist Council (AZC). During 1963 hearings the Senate revealed the equivalent of $35 million went toward US lobbying, including $38,000 to American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) founder Isaiah Kenen between 1960-1961...Since 2002 former American diplomat Dennis Ross has filed no FARA activity declarations. This could be a problem according to IRmep director Grant F. Smith. "The US Department of Justice has always asked US recipients of Jewish Agency funding -- whether the American Zionist Council and its US executives, or the Jewish Agency's New York office -- to register as agents of a foreign principal. With US-Iran diplomacy and restoration of productive relations looming so urgently, now is certainly not the time to resurrect foreign agent registration battles."  English  Turkish

President Barak Obama has passed over naming Dennis Ross to top Middle East or Iran policy jobs.  This is an intelligent move.  Ross has been correctly associated as a major negative factor in the failed Clinton administration peace negotiations.  Ross has also been perceived to be too much in the service of the objectives of the state of Israel and its US lobby to effectively negotiate on behalf of broader American interests.

His recent policy paper "Strengthening the Partnership: How to Deepen U.S.-Israel Cooperation on the Iranian Nuclear Challenge" (chartered by an AIPAC affiliated think tank) is a short roadmap for US military confrontation with Iran. It advocates blockades (an act of war which has brought poverty to Gaza) and ultimately military strikes on Iran. But US policy outcomes toward Iran are neither a foregone conclusion, nor should they mirror failed Israeli strategies. 

Any "super" US envoy to Iran needs proper qualifications and reputation.  They will have to have to gain the confidence of the Iranians and American voters. He or she must be deeply knowledgeable about the region and willing to engage in bona fide negotiations, rather than merely insisting on unilateral concessions under the veiled threat of military force. An American envoy must also break with the curious but useless tradition of "strategic ambiguity" regarding the Israeli nuclear arsenal. To do otherwise makes it look as though the United States is merely asserting Israeli nuclear hegemony over the region rather than seeking peace.

If President Bush is wavering or Barack Obama is considering pardons upon entering office, historical precedent indicates that pardons for crimes perpetrated in the name of Israel are costly but yield no benefits. Kennedy's unintended leniency provided a green light for financing the Israeli nuclear weapons program. The Marc Rich pardon produced nothing but embarrassment for Clinton and is now a possible nomination hurdle for Eric Holder. A pardon of Jonathan Pollard would probably result in intensified unauthorized transfers of sensitive national defense information to Israel in the future. A Rosen and Weissman pardon would signal that the Israel lobby may freely pursue covert action to use the U.S. military against Israel's enemies. Tough diplomacy, unfettered law enforcement, and reasonable penalties for criminal violations are historically the only proven techniques for keeping the Israel lobby in check.  More

Slavery and its aftermath was an embedded American problem—its resolution had nothing at all to do with Africa.  Much of the ongoing crisis in the Middle East is the product of another "peculiar institution"—the Israel lobby in the United States.  While president Lyndon Johnson did much to drive forward civil rights, his administration's prosecutorial immunity granted in secret to the Israel lobby was an enormous step backward for the United States.  The lobby's subversion of the Foreign Agents Registration Act was like a broken window leading to the decline of a prosperous neighborhood.  Soon a culture of impunity took over leading to Israel lobby money laundering, election fraud, nuclear secrets theft, commercial espionage and most recently, infiltration of the Pentagon in the interest of touching off a US military conflict with Iran. 

The lobby is currently attempting to reframe the Israeli blockade and attacks killing civilians as steps toward solving the "Palestinian" problem (and part of the "War on Terror").  The incoming Obama administration now must do what no US president since John F. Kennedy has tried to do—enforce the Foreign Agents Registration Act, the Espionage Act, and stop condoning through pardon the "broken windows" of the lobby.   Only then will America be ready to return to its pre-1948 status as an honest broker and force for positive change in the region.

In March, IRmep will begin sending a new briefing book to prosecutors and law enforcement officials about how US laws already on the books can protect America if properly enforced.  More importantly, it will show tactics for resisting politicization and outside interference with law enforcement agencies that has plagued counter espionage and FARA enforcement.  This will allow DOJ, with the critical support of the president, to begin rebuilding US credibility while fixing the "broken windows" that have led to American decline, peril and ongoing repression of Palestinians.  

Continue (Year 2008 Research and Events)